Monday, January 29, 2024

The Sandman

A generation before Poe, when the idea of a gothic horror story was decidedly more a German than an English or American notion, E.T.A. Hoffmann was widely regarded as the master of the genre. Not all of Hoffmann's stories involved horror as such -- but they were all "tales," in the sense that they set aside, for a moment, all the particularities of everyday life and took place in a generalized, imaginary realm halfway between moralistic parables and frightening fancies, where children were quite often in the thrall of cruel and unpredictable adults, and fears took palpable form. His tales in many ways resemble those of the Jakob and Wilhelm Grimm, which were first published just four years before "Der Sandmann."

Hoffmann was also a musician and a stage director, with the result that his tales often have  a theatre-like three-act structure, with powerful visual imagery and strong atmosphere. These have led them to be frequently adapted for stage, and later for screen; among the more notable versions have been Arthur Saint-Léon's "Coppélia" (1870), Offenbach's opéra fantastique "Tales of Hoffmann" (1881), Powell and Pressburger's 1951 film based upon it, and Paul Berry's 1993 Oscar-nominated stop-motion animation "The Sandman." Most recently, the young German director S. Andreas Dahn has brought out a relatively faithful period version, one which -- alas -- is not yet available on disc or streaming; the image above is of "Bela B." Felsenheimer in the title role.

But there's much more to this story than its dramatic touches, and vivid imagery. There's the primal scene of a child excluded from the adult world, the implicit threat of the Sandman, stealer of eyes (Freud read this as a displaced threat of castration), and the peculiar charms -- or lack thereof -- of an automaton woman. We often think that we today -- with our Terminators, cyborgs, replicants, and other semi-human robotic figures -- have invented the uncanny notion of a non-human human being, but in fact the idea is far older, going well back into the eighteenth century. Some of the automata built then still exist today, such as Maillardet's writing automaton. This small boyish figure, designed to sit at a writing desk and draw, was hard to identify when it was deposited at the steps of Philadelphia's Franklin Institute many years ago. Under patient care, its mechanism was restored, and a pen placed in its hand -- after which it produced six drawings, one of which the machine itself "signed," declaring, "I am the automaton of M. Maillardet" -- and so it identified itself (the idea was incorporated by David Selznick into his graphic novel The Invention of Hugo Cabret, which was adapted as a film by Martin Scorsese.

So read the story -- I suspect you will soon join the ranks of those haunted by its peculiar, shadowy scenes. Then choose one of this week's discussion questions, and post your answer below.

25 comments:

  1. Answering to Question 4

    I believe we are fascinated with the potential of humanoid figures and things of that nature with artificial intelligence because a lot of us want to get stuff done quicker. AI can pull information from anywhere with the snap of a finger and deliver it straight to you. If you ever wanted to know the recipe for something, just say it to your Amazon Echo and it will read out the whole list of instructions and ingredients needed. While things like this save a lot of time and are efficient (it helps me a lot), it can potentially be dangerous to humans. AI-powered devices/machines are trained to mimic the human thought process, interactions, and movements. With this, they may be able to perform certain jobs that are now occupied by people at a faster and more efficient rate. This could lead to an increase in unemployment and leave many people without options for jobs. Although this is a concern amongst many, I do believe we are still smarter and much more complete than AI. We are conscious, intuitive, creative, and can show emotion. AI excels in tasks that require speed, accuracy, and processing large amounts of data, but we are more attentive to detail and comprehensive. We have physical abilities, common sense, coordination, and the motor to make split-second decisions. That being said, humans are still miles better than AI at things like sports, music, painting, driving, cooking, and much more. While right now it is not a threat, AI will continue to develop in these areas of weakness to compete against us, potentially leading to some conflict.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I chose question 1. When I was young, my parents mentioned the Sandman as a gentle figure who helped kids drift off to sleep. Unlike the alarming portrayal in Hoffmann's story "The Sandman," where the character is portrayed as unsettling and frightening, the Sandman of my childhood was a comforting presence associated with bedtime routines and peaceful sleep. In our family, the Sandman sprinkled magic into children's pillows, lulling them into a restful state with soothing bedtime stories and gentle lullabies. The Sandman in our household was never linked to fear or danger but rather represented the comforting idea of a peaceful transition from wakefulness to sleep. The opposite was represented with Hoffmann, Hoffmann's portrayal of the Sandman is far darker and more menacing. In his story, the Sandman is depicted as a sinister figure who instills fear and anxiety in children by throwing sand into their eyes, eventually causing their eyes to fall out. This portrayal clearly contrasts with the gentle and benevolent image of the Sandman that many kids, including myself, probably grew up with. While Hoffmann's version of the Sandman evokes feelings of dread and unease, the Sandman of my childhood memories remains a symbol of comfort and tranquility, associated with the soothing rituals of bedtime.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just like most readers, I suspected that Spalanzani’s daughter Olympia was an automaton much sooner than the narrator. As I read the descriptions from the narrator about Olympia, I sensed an uncanniness of her demeanor and being. Despite her beautiful, encapsulating appearance felt by Nathaniel, something is just not right about her. Olympia fully depicts a doll-like object with her strange mannerisms, stiff body, limited vocabulary, and lack of movement. These delineations of her continuously add to an unsettling idea of what she truly is. Especially when I read of her behavior and mannerisms whilst Nathaniel was talking to her for prolonged periods of time, I sensed something unusual about her. No human being would sit so quiet and still with no added comprehensible conversation. Nathaniel admires Olympia so dearly with no realization of her automaton figure because he does not want to face the reality of his insanity. The automaton he is infatuated with acts as a reflection of himself. She can be illustrated as whatever he wants her to be in his mind. He believes at one point that she says more than what is programmed to do, so he can justify his attraction to her strangeness. His deep admiration voids the existence of Clara and his mother from his mind entirely. These women are tools of help and try to bring him back to reality in his madness. The arguments of Clara to counteract Nathaniel’s fear and anxiety deter him from loving her and to love something inhuman. He finds her gentle, sensible nature contradicting his manic, cynical mind and does not accept it. Nathaniel is controlled by the madness brought on by the traumatizing childhood story of the Sandman and other unsettling stories. The narrator is blinded by this realization because Nathaniel’s insanity causes him to not know what is real or not. He is blinded to the mechanics of the automaton, Olympia, because he longs to stay in this constant state of insanity brought on by his childhood trauma. He does not want to mature mentally so he chooses a doll over a real woman. Such stories have overwhelmed him so deeply that he ultimately becomes a terrifying, unruly madman like the Sandman.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jodi Fowler
    Question 1
    Growing up in Jamaica, we had what we called 'duppy' which almost like the ghost of dead people. These duppies were portrayed to have the tendacies to target children who were naughty around 3am in the mornings. They would make funny noises and scare children. Sometimes you'd here that these duppies would take set on children and the children would die. Then the people would go on the news and tell crazy recaps of what they heard or saw. As for the sandman, I have never heard that term, only in a movie on Netflix.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lexianna Santos:
    Question 2:

    In E.T.A. Hoffmann's "The Sandman," “the barometer dealer” Coppola almost serves as a symbol with the themes of perception and deception. Coppola almost plays as a separating line between what is reality or what is an illusion which is something Nathaniel struggles with. Coppola's resemblance Dr. Coppelius, who terrified Nathanael during his childhood, immediately caused Nathaniel to have suspicions. This similarity makes us wonder if they're actually the same person or if there's something more mysterious going on. The narrator's insistence that Coppola and Coppelius are the same person suggests a haunting present of Nathanael's past traumas into his present reality. When Coppola returns later in the story, he starts selling eyeglasses instead of barometers. This change is like a signal that Nathanael needs to see things more clearly. Nathanael's struggle to differentiate between reality and illusion, exemplified by his inability to see past Olympia's facade. The eyeglasses serve as a symbol of his desire for clarity and comprehension, especially concerning his romantic relationships and the genuine identities of those in his life. The connection between the eyeglasses and Olympia's eyes, is like Nathanael's trying to see through the illusion of Olympia's perfection and understand what's really going on. So, Coppola's character is all about making us readers to think about how we perceive reality and whether we're seeing things as they truly are or just what we want to see.



    ReplyDelete
  6. Brana Hargis
    questions 1-

    When I was a child I was told about this being who puts "sand" in your eyes when you sleep which is why you take up with crust in your eyes. It is different from E.T.A. Hoffmann, "The Sandman" in which the Sandman is a sinister character who causes harm, particularly to children. There is a similarity to the sand in eyes but in my story the sand is harmless and to keep you sleep longer. In E.T.A.'s version, the sandman the sand put in your eyes will eventually make them fall out.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 1. As a child I was told that the sandman would come to help bring dreams of happiness and help to keep nightmares away. They would tell me that if I was struggling to fall asleep he would come sprinkle sand, which would help me to dream. Unlike E.T.A. Hoffman's version of this character, I was never taught the impression that he would cause harm and bring evil to those who were bad. Comparing what I was told and what the story revealed, I would also say that I pictured the sandman as delightful, instead of something terrifying. After reading this story I was shocked to see the dark side to this childhood mythical character.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Question 1

    As a child I was never told this version of The Sandman, however I was told a much less scary version. The Sandman was a old wise man who would lay sand in your eyes as you sleep, which is why you have that crust in your eyes when you wake up, and the sand in your eyes would let your parents know that you fell asleep and were not awake all night. The "Sandman" in my version of the story was a nice old man sort of like a wizard who would only come if you fell asleep, and would definitely not rip your eyes out if you were awake.

    ReplyDelete
  9. In response to question 3
    I do believe that Coppola and Coppelius are the same people but, only to the narrator. I think that when Coppola first arrives on the narrator's doorstep, it reminds the narrator of Coppelius and of a bad time when he was younger. From there I think he becomes obsessed with the idea of Coppelius returning and becomes insane. Therefore, the second time he comes back Coppola isn't actually there especially because the professor says that he has left town. So, I believe he is selling eye lenses the second time because it is the narrator's imagination. These are then connected to Olympia's eyes because the narrator can see Olympia and her eyes much clearer through the window now. The narrator becomes obsessed with her even though we learn that she is just an automaton. I think that the narrator created this entire story through his imagination and insanity.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Carina Marques
    answering question 4:

    I believe humans are fascinated with cyborgs, automata, or humanoid figures with artificial intelligence because with AI specifically it is becoming more and more prevalent in everyday life. With the technology we have today it seems anything is possible and AI proves that when helping do school work, writing assignments, even helping with office work. AI is so easily accessible at any given moment, Siri, amazon echo, Alexa, google nest etc which I believe creates promise. They provide a source of certainty when you need something which is comforting, but along with how fast they have advanced I feel it also can lead to threat, Taking jobs, cheating through school, even outsmarting us and becoming out of our hands.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I chose question 1.
    As a child, my parents used to share a comforting bedtime tale about the sandman, a magical figure who gently sprinkled sleep-inducing magic into my eyes. It just allowed your parents to know that you had a good night of sleep. In my household, the sandman was never a source of fear. However, in Hoffmann's story "The Sandman," the character takes on a far more unsettling and frightening portrayal. Hoffmann depicts the Sandman as a menacing figure instilling fear and anxiety in children by throwing sand into their eyes, leading to the disturbing outcome of their eyes falling out.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Joe Johnson responding to Question 4:

    In the modern day, artificial intelligence is absolutely a threat. Although I believe a human-like rendition mimicking something like Coppelius from Der Sandmann is unlikely, I believe AI has been progressing far too rapid for us to keep up with. With AI able to write code and learn more through machine learning, it seems like it is only a matter of time before these programs gain a form of pseudo-consciousness. The programs will never “experience” real emotion, but I believe they will begin to form “opinions” based on research, and act out on them. Also, I think we are currently seeing the worst usage of AI begin to rear its head. People who use AI to generate “art” may be unaware that the programs are unable to create anything new, so images produced are simply stolen work from human artists mashed together in an attempt to look new. This means that, as some people have already realized, we live in an age where human beings spend their lives working while technology has begun to be allowed to “make” art. This view feels very dystopian to me; if anything, AI should be used to complete simple jobs so people can enjoy the human experience while the machines handle the mundane and monotonous tasks. As a musician myself, I feel as though AI could be utilized to create a society where people have time to explore their humanity. Instead, we are allowing these programs to become far too advanced for us to keep track of, and I believe AI will become a threat soon enough.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Byron - Answering question #4
      I feel today we feel even more so fascinated by things such as human things wth artifical intellgence because they are able to tells us human beings about the things we like without us telling them. Another reason is because these human like artiificial figures are able to create these unique things that we humans could have never thought of such as machinery. I think these things can be both a threat and a promise because it is allowing a andvancement in technolgy but at the same time it is leaving people job less.

      Delete
  13. Mia JeanLouis
    I choose to answer question 2
    The novel's introduction of Coppola as a barometer trader raises suspicions in the narrator's mind that he might be the same villainous figure as Dr. Coppelius. The mystery surrounding Coppola's identity heightens the unnerving atmosphere and emotional strain of the narrative. Coppola reappears later in the story and gives eyeglasses instead of barometers, which only helps to emphasize how strange and enigmatic the figure is. The connection to Olympia's eyes may have a deeper significance, suggesting a theme of deception or distorted perception. In this instance, glasses might represent a tool to manipulate or distort vision, implying that perception and reality are altered.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Allison Quinn
    Answer to 4:
    I think much like the main character in The Sandman projecting this human like quality onto Olympia I think we often do that with AI today. I think the idea of possibly creating something resembling “Human life” is fascinating to people. A lot of people feel as though we are alone in space, or the world, and the idea of being able to create something that is as complicated and intrigante as humans an interesting topic. I think in the case of Olympia she isn’t a threat and I don’t think many cyborgs, or automata’s will be. I think they can be useful tools and interesting creations. However, I think their always that fear of something being to human as well like AI. It’s a fascinating horror, and I think sometimes cyborgs and AI can be used for the wrong purposes. That being said though I don’t think of these things as a threat because of that. As a concept on their own I think they are marvelous, but as they evolve especially in times like today based on who controls them is when they can potentially become a threat.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I would like to write about question 5, "Why eyes?" I was thinking about this while reading the story as well. when I was younger my parents told me about the sandman and how he sprinkled dust in your eyes at night to make you sleepy. However during this story this man is more of a villain and takes the eyes of those who do not sleep. I feel as if that is because our eyes have significant meaning to us and we can say a lot of body language through our eyes. they are a hole into who we are, to see our life through them. Because of this significant meaning, the sandman eats them to take a part of who we are, leaving us feeling lifeless and drained. part of the story described how the parents were less happy when the sandman came around, due to this. I enjoyed the read and the short film, but will never SEE "The sandman" tale the same way again!

    ReplyDelete
  16. Amanda Viveiros

    I am going to be responding to Q1.
    When I was younger the sandman was definitely a figure that was mentioned in my house. Especially at nap time as well as bed time. In my house though the Sandman was talked about as a gentle figure that helps you rather than hurts you. You would be excited for going to bed because you knew he was coming and would try and stay awake so you could finally see him. In this story though it was a completely different deal. In the story rather than putting sleepy dust on your pillow it takes away your eyes if you aren't sleeping and replaces them with buttons. The story is creepy and dark and the sandman represents children's fears, like the fear of the unknown as well not being able to be in control. Overall of the Sandman was represented like this when I was younger I would have been terrified and definitely not excited to try and see him when I went to sleep at night.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Elizabeth Rubenstein
    I am responding to question 5: why eyes? Eyes are so crucial to who we are and what we can learn. You can tell a lot about someone by directly looking at them and looking them in the eyes. You can assess their reality trustworthiness and even tell how they feel. As the story says, "The eyes are the window to the soul." This is very true, and eyes give away about a person. They seem to be one of the most essential parts of your body that you use to help you in many ways. Growing up, the sandman was always a sweet story about how he would come into your room at night and sprinkle sand dust in your eyes so that you would sleep. It almost seemed he was helping and ensuring your eyes got the rest they needed for the next day of seeing the world. This story, however, is different; he isn't a nice person helping you sleep. However, it is the opposite; he takes your eyes if you do not sleep! When he takes them from you, he wants them; this can make a person feel like they are not themselves anymore. This is because the natural eyes are who we are, and we see our lives and others' lives through them. The parents were not happy or thrilled when he came to visit; it was not a guest you wanted to have. I believe this was because they knew that without our eyes, we have part of our life taken from us. The sandman wants to make sure our "most important" feature is getting the rest they need, and if not, then I guess you don't deserve them because the eyes are that important to him and his life each day.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I chose question number 4.

    I think in today's society everyone is fascinated by robots and cyborgs and technological things and it stems from curiosity and the advancement we are witnessing and the exploration of what it means to be human. the advancement of machines shows how we as a society are able to do and how the development of technology is changing the world around us. However with the rise of technological advancement it poses threat and misuse of power. especially what we are witnessing with the AI generated images, and songs. Artist are speaking up about the use of the voices being generated for music that did not create. It is very interesting what the future has in store for us pertaining to technological advancements.

    ReplyDelete
  19. When I was young, my mom, who's from Thailand, used to tell me about these eerie creatures that were a mix between a dog and a cat, big and shadowy, kind of like a blend of a wolf and a tiger. It's pretty different from Hoffmann's Sandman, who's all about stealing kids' eyes and stirring up fear with his sinister presence. My mom's version felt more like a tangible, lurking threat, something that could sneak up on you, blending the real with the supernatural. It was less about getting into your head and more about the scare of something unknown and powerful hiding just out of sight.

    Franz Eliasson

    ReplyDelete
  20. Lucas McElroy -
    I picked question four because I thought it was interesting. I believe we become fascinated because the humans as a society for the most part are lazy. For instance if we can have artificial intelligence do things for us that would make everyday life easier we would do it and we already are. ChatGPT is one of the first AI's of our time and people look stuff up on there before google sometimes. We would also eliminate the human error in a lot of things in dangerous jobs. I believe that some parts of AI are promising because of the resources they produce, the only problem is that they take jobs away from humans.

    ReplyDelete
  21. In regards to question 4, I think there are several reasons to why us humans are so fascinated with cyborgs, automata, or humanoid figures with artificial intelligence. One reason I could think of is because of the promises of innovation and progress. These technologies are invented for innovation, progress, and improved efficiency for human life. These inventions and technologies could offer solution to complex problems, enhance human capabilities, and lead to further advancements into various fields. Second is human curiosity. We are all curious to how something so small, like a nanochip, could process so much information, and us being curious humans, wants to find out if it works, or if its just an inconvenience. Last, is because of the speed of technological advancements. Technology updates everyday, and every year, new processors and technologies are invented. It keeps people on the loop. This captivates our imaginations and raises questions about the potential of merging human and machine capabilities. As of now, these technologies are looking like a promise for a better, more efficient life. But, I'm afraid that somewhere down the advancement, there could be concerns about potential misuse of technology, loss of control, and ethical implications that depicts these inventions as potential threats.

    - Ian Cabrera

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'll be answering the first question. After viewing The Sandman, I was reminded of a particular recollection that, in a manner similar to how The Sandman is portrayed, my parents used to tell me to frighten me. The narrative would be La Llorona, the tale of a grieving widow. When it got dark, my parents would tell us this story to keep my siblings and me inside. They would state that she would be looking for anyone who looked like her kids at night. Even though this tale differs slightly from The Sandman's, the same technique of frightening kids and monitoring their behavior was used.

    ReplyDelete